{{ gateRisk }}

{{ gateQuestion }}

Headcount is not destiny. These are approximate thresholds, not diagnoses.

Stage 1 · Align

{{ mandateNote }}

The climate you are personally creating

Four questions about your own pattern. They are here as a read on the climate, not as coaching.

Senior management's priorities, communication and participation around psychological health preceded later changes in job demands, resources, distress and engagement. Under fifty people, you are that senior management.

Honest note: we are not aware of direct evidence that improving founder wellbeing improves team outcomes. Research supports founder imprinting of employment systems [Moderate · Baron et al. 1996] and senior-management behaviour shaping demands and resources. Treat this as a hypothesis worth testing in your company, not a proven lever.

Continue to Map Back to the map

Stage 2 · Map

"People are exhausted" is a symptom. "We accept urgent work without a capacity check and make up the difference with unpaid availability" is a mechanism. Only mechanisms can be redesigned.

{{ a.name }} {{ a.state }}

Current condition Likely mechanism Business consequence

Continue to Listen Back to the map

Stage 3 · Listen

You can still ask everyone. A survey of fifteen people is not anonymous — we never report a group under five, and below about twenty-five we can only report at company level — and it would tell you less than fifteen conversations would. So this stage gives you an interview guide, not a questionnaire.

Rules for participation

Continue to Design Back to the map

Stage 4 · Design

{{ lane.title }}

{{ o.name }} {{ o.mvp }}

{{ o.driverBadge }} {{ o.practiceBadge }}

{{ o.condition }}

Why should this work?

Five fields per change. Export stays disabled until all of them are complete — a change without a stated reason is an activity, not a design.

{{ logicEmpty }}

What the evidence says about these levers

Continue to Install Back to the map

Stage 5 · Install

Before the clock starts

All five, honestly. The most common failure is running this alone.

Six process conditions make organisational changes work: delivery as intended, clear communication, genuine employee participation, visible senior-leadership support, line-manager support, and skilled external facilitation. Content matters too — but content alone, without these conditions, is not enough.

Continue to Learn Back to the map

Stage 6 · Learn

Interventions change conditions first — control, support, schedule influence — and health and retention later. Measuring only burnout at six months is weak design. Measure conditions, then process quality, then outcomes, in that order.

Open your reviews

Growth gates

{{ g.range }} {{ g.risk }} {{ g.question }}

Headcount is not destiny. These are approximate thresholds, not diagnoses.

At ninety days

You have run one cycle. Pick your next three — Design restarts, prefilled with what you kept.

Start the next cycle

{{ exportLabel }}

{{ a.name }}

{{ a.clearLabel }}

{{ a.blurb }}

{{ a.flag }}

Included in every export

Do not expect burnout to fall in ninety days. Structural changes may need longer to reach downstream outcomes, and a short cycle can make people more critical of the work environment before conditions improve. That is expected while conditions are genuinely changing. Conditions move first — interruptions, waiting on decisions, evening work. Wellbeing and retention follow later. Ninety days is one cycle, not the finish.

How this fails: you run it alone, without protected time or follow-through; you ask people what is wrong and change nothing; it becomes a perk while workload and decision systems stay the same; managers are made responsible for wellbeing without authority; flexibility becomes constant availability; the people absorbing overload keep getting recognised for it; it quietly adds meetings; you formalise too early or too late; purpose becomes a claim on people's time.

Review

{{ r.title }}

{{ r.status }}

Did it actually happen? What is the signal doing? What got in the way? Keep, adapt, or stop?

Measure

{{ measureBody1 }}

{{ measureBody2 }}

No group under five is ever reported. Between about ten and twenty-five people, reporting is at company level only — team-by-team breakdowns are neither statistically nor ethically defensible at that size.

Talk about measurement Use the interview guide instead

Science

How we rate evidence

The two-badge rule: practices carry two badges — one for the driver, one for the practice itself. A driver's strong rating never validates a specific implementation.

What we change, and what changes because of it

These are associations and intervention findings, not laws. Effects depend on the setting and on whether the change is actually implemented. Why do this early: employment models founders set at the beginning shaped the structures those companies still carried years later [Moderate · Baron 1996]. That is an argument about persistence, not a guarantee of results.

What the evidence does not support

Where this comes from

The practice layer draws on Matt Mochary's The Great CEO Within. Every description here is written fresh in our own words. Also worth reading: Andrew Grove's High Output Management, Jim Dethmer and Diana Chapman's The 15 Commitments of Conscious Leadership, and Ken Blanchard's One Minute Manager.

Where we differ. Mochary places individual productivity habits alongside structural ones. The evidence is clearer: individual coping is downstream of work design. So we install structural practices first. The book is also written for venture-scale companies; every practice here is rewritten for a team of five to fifty.